Inadequate security claims are a subset of premises liability cases that arise when someone is harmed on a property due to insufficient or negligent security measures. These claims hold property owners responsible for failing to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of people on their premises. Such failures often lead to preventable crimes or injuries, such as assaults, robberies, or other violent incidents.
Duty of Care
Property owners, landlords, and managers have a legal obligation to maintain a reasonably safe environment for individuals lawfully present on their property. This duty extends to tenants, customers, employees, and guests, depending on the type of property. For instance, owners of apartment complexes, shopping malls, hotels, or entertainment venues must take necessary precautions to protect visitors from foreseeable dangers, including criminal activity.
Breach of Duty
A property owner breaches their duty of care when they fail to implement or maintain appropriate security measures. Examples of such failures include:
When these shortcomings contribute to harm, the property owner may be held liable.
Foreseeability
An essential element of an inadequate security claim is demonstrating that the harm was foreseeable. Property owners are expected to recognize potential risks and take reasonable steps to mitigate them. For example:
Inadequate security claims often arise in situations such as:
Victims of crimes or injuries resulting from inadequate security can pursue compensation for various damages, including:
To succeed in an inadequate security claim, strong evidence is essential. This may include:
By building a compelling case with detailed evidence, victims can demonstrate the property owner’s failure to fulfill their duty of care and pursue the compensation they deserve.
Browse our collection of helpful legal resources specifically catered to your local community.
View Local Resources