Jury nullification occurs when a jury delivers a verdict of "not guilty" despite evidence of the defendant's guilt because they disagree with the law or believe its application would be unjust. This reflects the jury’s power to exercise discretion and refuse to convict under certain circumstances.
While jury nullification is rare, it is a controversial aspect of the jury system, balancing the rule of law with the conscience of the community.
Jury nullification is important because it empowers juries to act as a check on laws perceived as unjust or improperly applied. It underscores the jury’s role in reflecting societal values and provides a mechanism for addressing inequities in the legal system.
However, it is also contentious, as it can undermine the consistency and predictability of the law.
Jury nullification highlights the tension between strict legal application and the moral judgment of citizens.
